Private Party Standing and EU Risk Regulation

Standing determines a person’s ability to obtain judicial review of a legal act by the government. Judicial review of EU measures, including risk regulatory measures, is an important device to ensure that the rule of law is respected. Even after the changes brought about by the Lisbon Treaty, private parties still have limited standing rights under EU law to challenge EU risk regulations.While they are able to challenge “decisions” addressed to them (or, in some cases, addressed to others), they generally have been unable to claim standing at the European courts to seek reviewof generally binding rules. These restricted standing rights for private parties have been the subject of debate and criticism, both before and after the changes brought about by the Lisbon Treaty.

This article discusses the EU law standing requirements for private parties, the rationale and justification for the current restrictive conditions, and the effects of expanded standing for private parties on the legality, quality and effectiveness of EU risk regulation. Thus, the focus is not on the formal legitimacy, but on the functional characteristics of judicial review. Of course, standing extends beyond risk regulation, and, the current restricted standing rights and any future expanded standing rights apply more broadly to any generally binding EU rules. There would appear to be no reason to limit an expansion of standing rights to risk regulation. Nevertheless, risk regulation may be different from other areas of regulation in that it relies heavily on science, involves a relatively high number of precautionary measures, and may be seriously politicized. As a result, the need for court review in the area of risk regulation may be greater, because the risk of unlawful decisions driven by politicized, precautionary science and activist policy-makers is greater. It is not the purpose of this paper, however, to explain exactly how the issues are different for risk regulation, as opposed to other areas. Rather, I assume that enhanced standing is particularly important for risk regulatory measures, based on the theoretical argument set out above. Even if one rejects this assumption, however, it is still beyond doubt that standing rights are also highly relevant to risk regulation.



Copyright: © Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH
Source: Issue 03/2016 (September 2016)
Pages: 12
Price: € 41,65
Autor: Prof. Dr. Lucas Bergkamp

Send Article Add to shopping cart Comment article


These articles might be interesting:

Experten aus Wirtschaft, Politik und Wissenschaft: Vorschau auf die Berliner Konferenz ‚Mineralische Nebenprodukte und Abfälle‘
© Deutscher Fachverlag (DFV) (5/2017)
Gemeinsam mit den Aachener Professoren Dr.-Ing. Bernd Friedrich, Dr.-Ing. Thomas Pretz, Dr.-Ing. Peter Quicker, Dr.-Ing. Dieter Georg Senk und Dr.-Ing. Hermann Wotruba ist es Dr. Stephanie Thiel zum wiederholten Mal gelungen, hochrangige Experten aus Wirtschaft, Politik und Wissenschaft für die Berliner Konferenz ‚Mineralische Nebenprodukte und Abfälle’ (12./13. Juni 2017) zu gewinnen. Unterstützt wurden sie dabei vom engagierten Beirat.

Brexit – Wie beeinflussen Importmengen aus England und Europa den Abfallverbrennungsmarkt in Deutschland?
© Witzenhausen-Institut für Abfall, Umwelt und Energie GmbH (5/2017)
In den letzten Jahren hat sich der Entsorgungsmarkt in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland als auch den angrenzenden Ländern erheblich gewandelt. Wurden in den Jahren 2012/13 noch Spotvertragsmengen an gemischten Gewerbeabfällen zu Verwertungspreisen von 50 bis 60 €/Mg (und darunter) an thermische Verwertungsanlagen geliefert, so sind derzeit keinerlei freie Verwertungskapazitäten vorhanden.

Absenkung europäischer Umweltschutzstandards als Folge der durch CETA beabsichtigten „regulatorischen Kooperation“
© Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (12/2016)
Das zwischen der EU und Kanada geplante Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement – kurz CETA – führt zu einer Absenkung europäischer Umweltschutzstandards durch Aushöhlung des Vorsorgeprinzips. Zwar lässt CETA das europäische Primärrecht ebenso wie die sekundärrechtlichen Verordnungen und Richtlinien der EU formal zunächst unberührt.

Current Developments in European Waste-to-Energy
© TK Verlag - Fachverlag für Kreislaufwirtschaft (9/2016)
In December 2015, one year after withdrawing the first Circular Economy package, the Juncker Commission published a broader and more ambitious proposal with revised targets and harmonized calculation methods for recycling. In parallel, the European Commission is still working on the Energy Union, a strategy that is the core of the institution’s work in which Waste-to-Energy will play a role. Finally, the Commission will publish a communication focused on Waste-to-Energy aiming to explore the opportunities offered by Waste-to-Energy, particularly with regard to synergies between resource and energy efficiencies by the end of 2016.

New Waste-to-Energy Facility Energy Works Hull, United Kingdom
© TK Verlag - Fachverlag für Kreislaufwirtschaft (9/2016)
Energy Works Hull (the Project) is a milestone project for the UK’s waste and renewable energy sector. It will be one of the largest gasification facilities receiving MSW in the UK, indeed in Europe. It is one of the first advanced conversion technology Projects to receive its renewable electricity subsidies through a Contract for Difference, the mechanism by which the UK Government determined to move from Renewable Obligation Certificates following its Electricity Market Reform process. It also plays a significant part of the urban regeneration of the City of Hull. The level of community engagement and benefit has resulted in the project receiving a GBP19.9M grant from the European Union’s Regional Development Fund.

Username:

Password:

 Keep me signed in

Forgot your password?

Neu in ASK? Dann gleich registrieren und Vorteile nutzen...