Regulating the Use of Bisphenol A in Baby and Children’s Products in the European Union: Current Developments and Scenarios for the Regulatory Future

Parents of newborns and small children have recently been confronted with labels indicating that their purchases of a baby bottle, teethers or sippy cups are now ‘Bisphenol A-free’ (BPA). A synthetic chemical used in the production process of polycarbonate (plastics), Bisphenol A is currently making headline news in the US and the EU. Its questioned safety in food plastics, baby bottles and children’s toys has turned plastics into a political issue as it is systematically framed as a risk in media coverage.

Apart from regulatory exposure limits (Tolerable Daily Intake levels (TDI), Bisphenol A is currently not subject to any restrictions in use yet (although BPA will be subject to a ban on the EU level from spring 2011 onwards). However, with the REACH framework (Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation of Chemicals), a new regulatory framework for EU’s chemical policy in place since June 2007, these exposure limits may be reviewed and BPA may face regulatory action. This article aims to analyse the regulatory process of Bisphenol A in the EU as an example of an uncertain risk dossier. On the basis of document and media analysis and interviews, the main aim is to gain an understanding of how uncertain risks are being regulated in the European Union. To that end, the self-regulatory behavior of industry is also considered. On the basis of the current regulatory tools in place and the current state of affairs, as well as developments in the controversy around BPA, the paper concludes by presenting four scenarios that illustrate the dynamics of the case and its possible regulatory outcomes.



Copyright: © Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH
Source: Issue 01/2011 (Februar 2011)
Pages: 15
Price: € 41,65
Autor: Tessa Fox
Dr. Esther Versluis
Marjolein Van Asselt

Send Article Add to shopping cart Comment article


These articles might be interesting:

Product Liability Risks for the Chemicals Industry – Recent Developments in Europe
© Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (6/2011)
The present publication is a multi-jurisdictional overview on recent legal developments with regard to product liability risks for companies from the Chemicals industry. This combined effort was undertaken by various members of the Hogan Lovells Global Chemicals Product Liability Industry group. This two-part publication will in its first part focus on recent developments in Germany, the UK, Italy and France. The respective authors are Dr. Sebastian Lach (Germany), Dr. Hannah von Falkenhausen (Germany), Alex Woods (UK), Christian Di Mauro (Italy), Thomas Rouhette and Christelle Coslin (both France). The second part will focus on China and the US. The respective authors of these country parts are Trevor Jefferies, Courtney Colligan (both US) and Eugene Chen (China).

Risk vs Hazard and the Two Souls of EU Risk Regulation: A Reply to Ragnar Lofstedt
© Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (6/2011)
When called upon to regulate risk, the EU carries the threefold onus to (i) protect its people(s); (ii) ensure the functioning of the internal market; and also (iii) to allocate the resources available wisely and efficiently.

Informationsverpflichtungen nach Art. 33 der REACH-Verordnung und mögliche zivilrechtliche Folgen
© Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (3/2011)
Mit der seit Mitte 2007 nach langjährigen Diskussionen und zähen Verhandlungen in Kraft getretenen REACHVerordnung (EG) Nr. 1907/2006 wurde eine grundlegende Neuregelung der bisherigen Stoffpolitik in Europa eingeleitet. Nach dem Prinzip „no data, no market“ dürfen innerhalb des Europäischen Wirtschaftsraums nur noch chemische Stoffe in Verkehr gebracht werden, die vorher dort registriert worden sind.

Regulating Catastrophic Risks by Standards
© Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (2/2011)
This article analyses the role played by standards of protection in the regulation of catastrophic risks. It examines how to protect people against the occurrence of catastrophic events, considering that the related risk is highly uncertain and difficult to predict using rational methodologies. In this perspective, the article focuses on environmental risks and terrorist threats affecting common goods – namely environment and security – areas where any damage is susceptible to producing ruinous effects and huge casualties.

Der brandenburgische Leitfaden für die Beurteilung erheblicher und irrelevanter Stoffeinträge in Natura-2000-Gebiete
© TK Verlag - Fachverlag für Kreislaufwirtschaft (12/2010)
Gemäß Artikel 6 Abs. 3 der FFH-Richtlinie ist eine Prüfung der Verträglichkeit von Plänen und Projekten mit den Erhaltungszielen eines Natura 2000-Gebietes erforderlich, soweit derartige Pläne und Projekte geeignet sein könnten, einzeln oder im Zusammenwirken mit anderen ein entsprechendes Gebiet erheblich zu beeinträchtigen. Diese Vorgaben wurden mit § 34 BNatSchG auf Bundesebene und mit § 26 d BbgNatSchG im Land Brandenburg umgesetzt.

Username:

Password:

 Keep me signed in

Forgot your password?