Life Cycle Comparison of Waste-to-Energy Plant and Landfill in Europe by the Method of Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)

The study shows clear advantages of the thermal treatment of waste by energy generation, heat extraction and steam use as well as lower uncertainties of inflation during the aftercare period. The comparison of the two methods shows further advantages for the thermal treatment of waste by the extension of the scenario period above 20 operating years.

The objective of the EU to minimise negative effects to the environment caused by waste disposal leads to stringent operational and technical requirements  of waste disposal sites. The operational requirements include a minimum lasting aftercare period of 30 years whose significant expenditures have to be reserved during the operating period.

In addition to these requirements the member states shall set up a strategy which ensures that biodegradable municipal waste going to landfills will be reduced. As stated in Article 5 of the above-named directive biodegradable municipal waste going to landfills must be reduced to: 75% till 16th July 2006, 50% till 16th July 2009 and 35% till 16th July 2016 of the total amount (by weight) of the biodegradable municipal waste produced in 1995 or latest year before 1995 for which standardised EUROSTAT data is available.To achieve these targets waste management concepts have to be developed in many European countries to optimise collection, recycling and treatment of municipal waste. Therefore there is a demand of cost comparison studies, showing the long term costs of landfill compared to other waste treatment methods. CEWEP - Confederation of European Waste-to-Energy Plants e.V. ordered the following study - adapted to actual European conditions.

This report is based on the study “Total costs of ownership: Comparison Incineration Plant-Landfill ” ordered by the Bavarian State Ministry of Environment within the scope of the Technical Co-Operation Project Bavaria-Sao Paulo in February 2006.
In the study the landfill scenario is calculated rather conservative with an aftercare period lasting 40 years for literature shows aftercare periods up to 140 years . The method of Mechanical-Biological-Treatment plant is not evaluated.
The aim of the project is to develop a variable costs calculation for the total life cycle of the two alternatives after the “Total Costs of Ownership“ method. These alternatives are:

  • waste-to-energy plant and
  • landfill.



Copyright: © CEWEP - Confederation of European Waste-to-Energy Plants e.V.
Source:
Pages: 42
Price: € 50,00
Autor: Dipl.-Ing.(TU) Werner P. Bauer
Dipl.-Umwelting. (FH) Thomas Kroner
Dipl. Wirtschafts-Ing. (FH) Bernhard Lipowsky

Send Article Add to shopping cart Comment article


These articles might be interesting:

Gute Entwicklungschancen
© Rhombos Verlag (1/2008)
Die deutsche Entsorgungswirtschaft verfügt über ein großes Potential für Umwelttechnik und Arbeitsplätze

Druck im Kessel Premium
© Rhombos Verlag (6/2008)
Eine Reihe von technischen Maßnahmen kann die Energieeffizienz von Abfallverbrennungsanlagen verbessern

bifa-Text Nr. 57: Die Abfallwirtschaft im Jahr 2030 - Eine Szenarioanalyse nicht nur für Bayern
© bifa Umweltinstitut GmbH (5/2012)
In einer neuen Studie des bifa Umweltinstituts werden mögliche Entwicklungen der regionalen, nationalen und internationalen Rahmenbedingungen für die bayerische Abfallwirtschaft im Jahr 2030 dargestellt sowie deren Auswirkungen auf die Abfallwirtschaftsstrukturen und auf die Ökoeffizienz. Das Projekt wurde im Auftrag des Bayerischen Staatsministeriums für Umwelt und Gesundheit durchgeführt. Die Ergebnisse bieten auch anderen Behörden, Unternehmen und Verbänden in Deutschland eine Basis für die eigene Positionierung und Strategieentwicklung.

Mai-Fest für den Umweltschutz - IFAT 2008 in München
© Deutscher Fachverlag (DFV) (5/2008)
Internationaler und größer - die IFAT 2008. Zur weltweit bedeutendsten Messe für Wasser, Abwasser, Abfall und Recycling werden vom 5. bis 9. Mai in München mehr als 100.000 Besucher erwartet. Für sie gibt es mit rund 2.500 Ausstellern ein noch breiteres Angebot als vor drei Jahren.

SEWAGE SLUDGE MANAGEMENT IN SWITZERLAND
© IWWG International Waste Working Group (10/2007)
There are two main disposal channels for sewage sludge: -use as fertiliser in agriculture -final disposal. Recently, the use of sludge in agriculture has been questioned, in particular because of the inorganic and organic pollutants, including traces of drugs and hormones. The demand for sewage sludge as fertiliser has thus steadily decreased, all the more since a potential risk of contamination with BSE has been shown to exist.

Username:

Password:

 Keep me signed in

Forgot your password?